I read a post1 on FriendFeed about listening to MP3 backwards, it uses Audacity to do the trick.
I came out with this command:
ffmpeg -i src.mp3 /tmp/src.wav && python -c "import wave ; s = wave.open('/tmp/src.wav', 'rb') ; r= wave.open('/tmp/rev.wav', 'wb') ; r.setparams(s.getparams()) ; count = s.getnframes() while count > 0: count -= 1 s.setpos(count) r.writeframes(s.readframes(1))" && ffmpeg -i /tmp/rev.wav rev.mp3
It uses ffmpeg to convert mp3 to wave, then convert reversed wave back to mp3. The reversing process uses Python’s wave module. Here is a better formatting of code:
import wave s = wave.open('/tmp/src.wav', 'rb') r= wave.open('/tmp/rev.wav', 'wb') r.setparams(s.getparams()) count = s.getnframes() while count > 0: count -= 1 s.setpos(count) r.writeframes(s.readframes(1))
If readframes() returned a list of frames, line count would be reduced by four, and it could run much faster. It runs pretty slow, because it reverses frame by frame, I think Audacity could do this in a blink of second. But my point is to make the code one-liner (it actually is five lines).
Boom De YaDa is the audio file I used to test, the result is pretty interesting (or creepy?). You can listen it here (Hope Discovery wouldn’t mind).
1 Updated
Now this is a true one-liner:
ffmpeg -i src.mp3 /tmp/src.wav && python -c "import wave ; s = wave.open('/tmp/src.wav', 'rb') ; r= wave.open('/tmp/rev.wav', 'wb') ; r.setparams(s.getparams()) ; d = [s.readframes(1) for i in range(s.getnframes())] ; d.reverse() ; r.writeframes(''.join(d))" && ffmpeg -i /tmp/rev.wav rev.mp3
Python part:
import wave s = wave.open('/tmp/src.wav', 'rb') r= wave.open('/tmp/rev.wav', 'wb') r.setparams(s.getparams()) d = [s.readframes(1) for i in range(s.getnframes())] d.reverse() r.writeframes(''.join(d))
And it runs much faster!
[1] | http://friendfeed.com/no-future/a29546e7/how-to-listen-mp3s-backwards-wikihow is gone. |
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.